Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F.3d 1313 - Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp.

Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

299 F.3d 1313 · 2002

Citation profile

514
cited by 514 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

141 federal appellate · 75 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 514 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Phillips v. AWH Corp. (2005), Innova/Pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (2004)

141 federal appellate · 75 district ·

3660200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al. · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 514 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demonstrated an intent to deviate from the ordinary and accustomed meaning of a claim term by redefining the term or by characterizing the invention in the intrinsic record by using words or expressions of manifest exclusion or restriction, representing a clear disavowal of claim scope.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The words used in the claim[] are interpreted in light of the intrinsic evidence of record, including the written description, the drawings, and the prosecution history, if in evidence.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he specification 'is always highly relevant to the claim construction analysis. Usually, it is dispositive; it is the single best guide to the meaning of a disputed term.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.