United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
299 F.3d 150 · 2002
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Torres-Aguilar (2003), United States v. Bigelow (2006)
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583
Relies on United States v. Marquez · United States v. Truscello · United States v. A-Abras Inc. · United States v. Asuncion-Pimental
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At oral argument, the parties were asked to discuss the possibility of allowing the District Court to resentence Thomas on remand. Because the government has not requested such relief, however, we need not address this possibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“neither mandatory under, nor specifically recommended by, the Guidelines and [was] not a basic requirement for the administration of supervised release.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any identification in the name of another person,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.