Miller v. Straub’s Empirical Analysis
299 F.3d 570 · 2002
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Hill v. Lockhart · Wainwright v. Sykes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“AEDPA prohibits [a federal habeas court from using] lower court decisions in determining whether the state court decision is contrary to, or is an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is a common term in the legal world and, accordingly, federal judges are familiar with its meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Lyons v. Jackson“unreasonable.” Compare Francis S. v. Stone, 221 F.3d 100 , 111 (2d Cir.2000) (stating that an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Lyons v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.