Williams v. Bruton’s Empirical Analysis
299 F.3d 981 · 2002
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Carey Warden v. Saffold · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Ronnie Lee Gibson v. Ken Klinger -
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he running of the statute of limitations imposed by § 2244(d)(1)(A) is triggered by either (i) the conclusion of all direct criminal appeals in the state system, followed by either the completion or denial of certiorari proceedings before the United States Supreme Court; or (ii) if certiorari was not sought, then by the conclusion of all direct criminal appeals in the state system followed by the expiration of the time allotted for filing a petition for the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McMullan v. Roper“that process. In other words, until the application has achieved final resolution through the State's post conviction procedures, by definition it remains”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Payne v. Kemna“We review the district court's interpretation of the one-year AEDPA limitation provision de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Faulks v. Weber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.