¶1 Stephanie Angelo appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and state law claims because it found Defendant was entitled to qualified immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Angelo v. Thomas, No. 1:07-cv-00261-CMH-BRP (E.D. Va. filed December 18, 2007; entered Dec. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.