Bucks County Cable TV, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 47 U.S.C. § 154 · 47 U.S.C. § 402 · 47 U.S.C. § 502
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co. · United States v. Southwestern Cable Co. · Hynes v. Grimes Packing Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Administrative Procedure Act provides specifically not only for review of “[ajgency action made reviewable by statute” but also for review of “final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court,” 5 U.S.C. § 704 . The legislative material elucidating that seminal act manifests a congressional intention that it cover a broad spectrum of administrative actions, and this Court has echoed that theme by noting that the Administrative Procedure Act’s “generous review provisions” must be given a “hospitable” interpretation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Administrative Procedure Act supplements the special statutory review procedures for final orders of the various agencies. Its review provisions utilize traditional equity actions for agency ac-' tion not amounting to a final order, but which nonetheless directly affects plaintiff’s rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.