Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 FSUPP 958 - Bartle v. Markson

Bartle v. Markson’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 1996

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

601969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Weiss · Bartle v. Markson · United States v. American Surety Co. of New York · Bartle v. Markson Bros. · 267 F. Supp. 915 - Glenmore Distilleries Company v. Seideman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““that the defendant was personally involved in the fraudulent transfers of the corporate property to Son-Mark; that they were to his benefit; that he not only failed to give the creditors notice of this but actually misled them into thinking that business was continuing as usual; that he personally transferred and permitted transfers of cash collections of the corporation to Son-Mark, knowing that creditors were demanding payment and could not be paid; and that his conduct amounted to a violation of Section 276 of the Debtor-Creditor Law in that it was engaged in with ‘actual intent’ to defraud and hinder present and future creditors.” 299 F.Supp. 958, 966 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.