Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F. Supp. 2d 309 - McClain v. Barnhart

299 F. Supp. 2d 309 - McClain v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
October 2016
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Thomas v. Arn · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Small v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “should be able to learn to read, write, and do math, and discuss history and science. [They] will need to use these skills in academic situations to demonstrate what [they] have learned; e.g., by reading about various subjects and producing oral and written projects, solving mathematical problems, taking achievement tests, doing group work, and entering into class discussions. [They] will also need to use these skills in daily living situations at home and in the community (e.g., reading street signs, telling time, and making change). [They] should be able to use increasingly corn plex language (vocabulary and grammar) to share information and ideas with individuals or groups, by asking questions and expressing [their] own ideas, and by understanding and responding to the opinions of others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.