Rombot v. Moniz’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al. · Aguilar v. United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement Division of the Department of Homeland Security · Francisco Vasquez v. Janet Reno Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even after the REAL ID Act, however, the district court holds jurisdiction to review habeas challenges to unlawful immigration detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alam v. Nielsen“over challenges to the legality of detention in the immigration context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.