Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 GA 125 - Stanbury v. State

Stanbury v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

42 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Malcolm v. State · State v. Kelly · Cheddersingh v. State · Hamm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the [trial],”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Indeed, under all the circumstances of this case, the trial court adversely affected [Stroud's] 'substantial rights' by failing to provide the required [circumstantial evidence] charge because the charges as given failed to provide the jury with the proper guidelines for determining [Stroud's] guilt or innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The third prong of the ... plain error test requires that the error must have affected the appellant's substantial rights, which in the ordinary case means he must demonstrate that it affected the outcome of the trial court proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.