Propst v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
46 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · District of Columbia v. Heller · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the defendant fails to satisfy either prong of the Strickland test, this Court is not required to examine the other.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The State, including any part of the prosecution team, possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the favorable evidence and could not obtain it himself with any reasonable diligence; (3) the State suppressed the favorable evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the trial would have been different had the evidence been disclosed to the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In reviewing the trial court's decision, 'we accept the trial court's factual findings and credibility determinations unless clearly erroneous, but we independently apply the legal principles to the facts.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.