Pippen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Wright v. State · Harwell v. State · Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under plain error review, we will reverse the trial court only if the alleged instructional error was not affirmatively waived, was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, likely affected the outcome of the proceedings, and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In reviewing a challenge to the trial court's jury instruction, we view the charge as a whole to determine whether the jury was fully and fairly instructed on the law of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not required to instruct on the meaning of all words used in the charge, particularly words of common understanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hood v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.