Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 GA 841 - Cisneros v. State

Cisneros v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Smith v. Francis · Bradshaw v. State · Lobdell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who does not directly commit a crime may nevertheless be convicted as a party to that crime upon proof that he or she intentionally aided or abetted the commission of the crime, or intentionally advised, encouraged, hired, counseled, or procured another to commit the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Whether a person is a party to a crime may be inferred from that person's presence, companionship, and conduct before, during, and after the crime,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “All of the participants in a plan to commit a crime are criminally responsible for the acts of each, committed in the execution of the plan, and which may be said to be a probable consequence of the unlawful design, even though the particular act may not have actually been a part of the plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.