Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 Ga. App. 3 - State v. Carter

299 Ga. App. 3 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vansant v. State · Smith v. State · 260 Ga. App. 197 - Gray v. State · 288 Ga. App. 436 - English v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed. Because Fourth Amendment rights are personal, a defendant may move to suppress evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure only when his own rights were violated. [Thus,] to challenge the search, a defendant must show he had an expectation of privacy in the premises searched.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.