Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 ILL 145 - Fisher v. Birkey

Fisher v. Birkey’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2002

14 state decisions

40192119301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cruickshank v. Bidwell · People ex rel. School Directors v. Buskirk · Thompson v. Beaver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Changes in the boundaries of school districts cannot at all times be made to give equal opportunities and the same convenience to all the inhabitants affected by such changes, and where it appears from such changes that the wishes and convenience of a majority of the inhabitants of the districts are served and the other parties affected are not greatly inconvenienced or oppressed or outraged by the change, a court of equity cannot interfere, by way of injunction, to set aside- and declare void the action of the trustees or of the county superintendent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where * * * tbe action of tbe trustees or tbe county superintendent is clearly shown to be so unreasonable and unjust to those complaining as to amount to oppression and a wanton disregard of their rights and interests, then a court of equity will interfere to set aside such unjust and oppressive decision and grant such other relief as may be necessary and proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.