State v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Plummer · State v. Urban · State v. McDaniel & Owens · State v. Bridges · State v. Rueckert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'K.S.A. 22-3212 . . . sets out comprehensive notice and discovery requirements for the parties in criminal trials.' State v. Edwards, 299 Kan. 1008, 1015 , 327 P.3d 469 (2014).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Marks“held in the past that the code of civil procedure may apply in criminal proceedings when the code of criminal procedure provides no contrary provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Moeller“[i]f the legislature intended to require special expert witness requirements, it could have placed those requirements in K.S.A. 22-3212.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Marks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.