Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 KAN 263 - State v. Todd

State v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

58 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Weaver v. Graham · Collins v. Youngblood · Miller v. Florida · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[A] failure to provide the jury with the cautionary accomplice witness instruction . . . is not error . . . when the jury is cautioned about the weight to be accorded testimonial evidence in other instructions.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Article I, § 10, of the United States Constitution states simply that '[n]o State shall . . . pass any . . . ex post facto [l]aw.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'it must be retrospective, that is it must apply to events occurring before its enactment, and it must disadvantage the offender affected by it. [Citations omitted.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.