State v. Sievers’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “brought to trial within 180 days after arraignment . . . shall be entitled to be discharged from further liability”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Razzaq · 59 Kan. App. 2d 49 - State v. Stevenson

2. “happen[ed] as a result of the application or fault of the defendant,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Razzaq · State v. Queen

3. “After any trial date has been set within the time limitation prescribed by subsection (a), (b) or (c), if the defendant fails to appear for the trial or any pretrial hearing, and a bench warrant is ordered, the trial shall be rescheduled within 90 days after the defendant has appeared in court after apprehension or surrender on such warrant. 9 However, if the defendant was subject to the 180-day deadline prescribed by subsection (b) and more than 90 days of the original time limitation remain, then the original time limitation remains in effect.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 59 Kan. App. 2d 49 - State v. Stevenson