Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 KAN 479 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

121 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Oregon v. Kennedy · United States v. Josef Perez · Richardson v. United States · State v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consideration of the theory is necessary to serve the ends of justice or to prevent the denial of fundamental rights.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is not necessary that there be direct evidence of either intent or premeditation. Instead, premeditation, deliberation, and intent may be inferred from the established circumstances of a case, provided the inferences are reasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “I had no reason to. I don't believe I would have had a reason. That's not my style.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.