State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
121
cited by 121 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited
121 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Oregon v. Kennedy · United States v. Josef Perez · Richardson v. United States · State v. Ward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consideration of the theory is necessary to serve the ends of justice or to prevent the denial of fundamental rights.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ford · State v. N.R.“[I]t is not necessary that there be direct evidence of either intent or premeditation. Instead, premeditation, deliberation, and intent may be inferred from the established circumstances of a case, provided the inferences are reasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mendez · State v. Zongker“I had no reason to. I don't believe I would have had a reason. That's not my style.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.