State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
68 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Miller-El v. Dretke · Lawrence Metze v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'looking at all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and determining whether a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gonzalez · State v. Parker“[p]rejudicial conduct, in or outside the courtroom, [made] it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to either the defendant or the prosecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.