Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 KAN 509 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

68 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Miller-El v. Dretke · Lawrence Metze v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Appellate courts do not reweigh evidence, resolve evidentiary conflicts, or make witness credibility determinations.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'looking at all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and determining whether a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[p]rejudicial conduct, in or outside the courtroom, [made] it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to either the defendant or the prosecution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.