Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 KAN 594 - State v. DeAnda

State v. DeAnda’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Alleyne v. United States · Gully v. New York Commissioner of Labor · State v. Soto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the standard of review is whether, after a review of all the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the defendant, a rational factfinder could 30 have found by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of the mitigating circumstance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “consider[s] whether, after review of all the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational factfinder could have found the existence of the aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.