State v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘the affidavit provided a substantial basis for the magistrate’s determination that there is a fair probability that evidence will be found in the place to be searched. Because the reviewing court is able to evaluate the necessarily undisputed content of an affidavit as well as tire issuing magistrate, the reviewing court may perform its own evaluation of the affidavit’s sufficiency under this deferential standard.’ [Citation omitted.]” State v. Hensley, 298 Kan. 422, 428 , 313 P.3d 814 (2013).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 51 Kan. App. 2d 514 - State v. Mullen

2. “When evidence is illegally obtained, its suppression may be warranted under the exclusionary rule, which is a judicially created rule that safeguards against unconstitutional searches and seizures by suppressing illegally seized evidence as a deterrent to future violations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Arceo-Rojas

3. “When material facts underlying defendant's claim are not disputed, 'the issue is a question of law over which an appellate court has unlimited review.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Hillard