Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 MASS 435 - Evans's Case

Evans's Case’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
7
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably 29 Cal. 2d 79 - Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commision (1946), Zerofski's Case (1982)

48 state decisions

130193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DeFilippo's Case · Bellows v. Worcester Storage Co. · Di Clavio's Case · Crowley's Case · Rozek's Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An insurer takes the employee in the condition in which it finds him, and becomes bound to compensate him according to the provisions of the act for incapacity resulting from any compensable personal injury received during the period covered by the policy.” (Workmen’s Compensation Insurance Policy). And at page 28-29 the Court said: “ Where incapacity results from the combined effect of several distinct personal injuries, received during the successive periods of coverage of different insurers, the result is not an apportionment of responsibility nor responsibility on the part of either or any insurer at the election of the employee. The implication of the act is that only one of successive insurers is to make compensation for one and the same incapacity. * * * Where there have been several compensable injuries, received during the successive periods of coverage of different insurers, the subsequent incapacity must be compensated by the one which was the insurer at the time of the most recent injury that bore causal relation to the incapacity.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where there have been several compensable injuries received by employee during the successive periods of coverage of different insurers, the subsequent incapacity must be compensated by the one which was the insurer at the time of the most recent injury that bore causal relation to the incapacity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.