Calhoun v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Curley v. State (1984), Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1988)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hicks · State v. Frazier · Williams v. State · Arthur Treacher's Fish & Chips of Fairfax, Inc. v. Chillum Terrace Ltd. Partnership · State v. Pudlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First: a party or the court sua sponte must request the postponement. Second: good cause must be shown by the moving party. Third: the County Administrative Judge, or a judge designated by him, must approve the extension of the trial date.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) Setting the date.—The date for trial of a criminal matter in a circuit court: (1) Shall be set within 30 days after the earlier of: (1) The appearance of counsel; or (ii) The first appearance of the defendant before the circuit court, as provided in the Maryland Rules; and (2) May not be later than 180 days after the earlier of those events. "(b) Changing date.—On motion of a party or on the court's initiative and for good cause shown, a county administrative judge or a designee of that judge may grant a change of the circuit court date. "(c) Court rules.—The Court of Appeals may adopt additional rules of practice for the implementation of this section in circuit courts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dorsey v. State““[W]hen there are several orders by the administrative judge postponing a criminal trial, and one of those orders has the effect of postponing the trial beyond the 180-day deadline, it is the latter order with which a judge hearing a motion to dismiss is concerned. The critical order by the administrative judge, for purposes of the dismissal sanction, is the order having the effect of extending the trial date beyond 180 days.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.