State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · State v. Frazier · Farinholt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the defendant has met the burden of establishing that the administrative judge’s decision to postpone the trial date, and the length of delay until the new trial date, represent a clear abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cook“Although the length of the delay from November 23rd to March 8th may be substantial, it is explained by the extensive proceedings and opinion on the suppression matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cook“the unavailability of a court does not, as a matter of law, constitute a lack of good cause for postponement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.