Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 Minn. 56 - State v. Propotnik

State v. Propotnik’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably State v. Ballard (1981), Davis v. State (1976)

34 state decisions

20019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · United States v. Frontero · Wade v. Coiner · Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · United States v. Sherman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true that defendant was not questioned specifically concerning his right to confront his accusers at trial. However, since the record shows that defendant had full opportunity to consult with counsel before entering his plea, we may safely presume that counsel informed him adequately concerning this right. * * * Further, and we believe significantly, the record includes a copy of the petition to enter a plea of guilty which defendant had signed and which he admitted reading and understanding. That petition informed defendant of a number of his constitutional rights, including “the right to see and hear all witnesses against me.” On such a record we believe it proper to conclude that defendant entered his’ plea voluntarily and intelligently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.