Alexander v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 60 Okla. Crim. 409 - Patton v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 143 - Mayo v. State · 81 Okla. Crim. 248 - Wyatt v. State · 83 Okla. Crim. 365 - Linde v. State · 63 Okla. Crim. 165 - May v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By statute it is provided that a party desiring to appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeals shall give notice of such appeal in open court either at the time the judgment is rendered or within ten days thereafter. 22 O.S.1951 § 1055. “An appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeals must be taken in the manner prescribed by statute and notice of appeal made in the manner and within the time prescribed by statute is jurisdictional.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Neal v. State““While an appeal may be taken by defendant as a matter of right from judgment of conviction, the manner of taking and perfecting such appeal is a proper matter of legislative control, and the statute prescribing the manner in which an appeal can be taken is mandatory.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Neal v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.