Wagner v. Wagner’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Breck v. Ulmer · 103 Cal. App. 2d 405 - Kalmus v. Kalmus · Cox v. Cox · Wright v. State · Siggelkow v. Siggelkow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A refusal to grant a continuance constitutes an abuse of discretion 'when a party has been deprived of a substantial right or seriously prejudiced.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Brandner v. Pease“the necessity for orderly, prompt and effective disposition of litigation and the loss and hardship to the parties [and] witnesses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Solomon v. Solomon“so unreasonable or so prejudicial as to amount to an abuse of discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Erwin v. Mendenhall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.