Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Walker · Matter of Christopher H. · State Ex Rel. Rucker v. Tapp · Matter of Adoption of Blevins · Gillette v. Gillette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"FAILURE TO PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THIS' HEARING CONSTITUTES CONSENT TO THE TERMINATION OF YOUR PARENTAL RIGHTS TO THIS CHILD OR THESE CHILDREN. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR ON THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED, YOU MAY LOSE ALL LEGAL RIGHTS AS A PARENT TO THE CHILD OR CHILDREN NAMED IN THE PETITION OR MOTION ATTACHED TO THIS NOTICE."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tosto v. State“[Tlhe statute for termination of parental rights for failure to appear after notice does not prohibit.-the state from asking for default termination, nor does it limit the trial court from granting such termination at noticed hearings other than a date set for trial on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tosto v. State“Failure to respond to this summons or to appear at this hearing constitutes consent to the adjudication of these children. as deprived children and may ultimately result in loss of custody. of these children or the termination of parental rights to these children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tosto v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.