Florida Bar v. Joyce’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1982
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I This petition is filed pursuant to Article XVI of the integration Rule of The Florida Bar. II This Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction to prohibit the unauthorized practice of law pursuant to Article V, Section 15, of the Florida Constitution. III Petitioner is charged with the duty and responsibility of initiating and prosecuting, in this Court, proceedings against the unauthorized practice of law. IV Article II, Section 2, of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar provides in part that “[n]o person shall engage in any way in the practice of law in this state unless such person is an active member of The Florida Bar in good standing....” V The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has authorized the institution of this proceeding against respondent. VI Respondent, at all times material herein, was not and is not a member of The Florida Bar, and was not and is not therefore licensed to engage in the practice of law in the State of Florida. VII Respondent has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Florida by one or more of the following acts: 1. A copy of a Cease and Desist Affidavit which was signed by respondent on June 29, 1979, pursuant to petitioner’s investigation of alleged instances of unauthorized practice of law and previous to the occurrence of the acts alleged immediately below, is attached hereto and marked “A”. 2. On or about May 14, 1980, Suburban Chevrolet Co., 1100 Excelsior Avenue, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343, received a Statement of Claim a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.