Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 SW3D 284 - Williams v. Bittel

Williams v. Bittel’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on Moore v. Asente · McDonald v. Hester · Wallace v. Wallace · Mauldin v. Bearden · Sullivan v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Williamses successfully circumvented the spirit of the law. Their actions create the precise problems that the UCCJEA and the PKPA attempted to avoid: viz., interstate custody disputes and competition. 11”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.