Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 SW3D 294 - Belcher v. State

Belcher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morgan v. Illinois · State v. McMillin · Maltz v. Jackoway-Katz Cap Co. · Barry v. State · State v. Belcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘A mere recital or statement that the motion, files and records conclusively show that movant is entitled to no relief will not constitute compliance with [the post-conviction motion rule]. Nor will findings and conclusions be supplied by implication from the trial court’s ruling.’ The findings of fact and conclusions of law must be sufficiently specific to allow meaningful appellate review. Where the motion court determines a ground for relief is refuted by the files and records, the court should identify the portion of the file or record that does so.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.