Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 U.S. 1 - Woolsey v. Best

Woolsey v. Best’s Empirical Analysis

299 U.S. 1 · 1936

Citation profile

157
cited by 157 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

72 federal appellate · 12 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 157 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2012 · most notably Johnson v. Zerbst (1938), Yakus v. United States (1944)

72 federal appellate · 12 district · 18 state decisions

730193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knewel v. Egan · Harlan v. McGourin · Craig v. Hecht · Riddle v. Dyche

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a writ of error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.