Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 U.S. 119 - McKey v. Paradise

McKey v. Paradise’s Empirical Analysis

299 U.S. 119 · 1936

Citation profile

136
cited by 136 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 136 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2010 · most notably Auto-Train Corp. v. Midland-Ross Corp. (1987), Mahon v. Stowers (1974)

31 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

340193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedParadise v. McKey (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on National City Bank v. Hotchkiss · Blakey v. Brinson · Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Adams v. Champion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No fund was segregated or set up by special deposit or in any manner.... The bankrupt was a debtor which had failed to pay its debt. We know of no principle upon which that failure can be treated as a conversion of property held in trust.... It would be impossible to state all the circumstances in which equity will fasten a constructive trust upon property in order to frustrate a violation of fiduciary duty. But the mere failure to pay a debt does not belong in that category.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.