Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 U.S. 207 - United States v. Resnick

United States v. Resnick’s Empirical Analysis

299 U.S. 207 · 1936

Citation profile

311
cited by 311 later decisions
23
cited 23 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

117 federal appellate · 36 district · 89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 311 later decisions (23 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2013 · most notably Kordel v. United States (1948), United States v. Hark (1944)

117 federal appellate · 36 district · 89 state decisions — followed in 13 states

730193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wiltberger · Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. White · United States v. Lacher · United States v. Chase

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 311 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutes creating crimes are to be strictly construed in favor of the accused; they may not be held to apply to cases not covered by the words used. . . .”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The act . . . expresses no condemnation of two-quart hampers. Before one may be punished, it must appear that his case is plainly within the statute. ... As in absence of governmental regulation the making and selling of containers is untrammeled, failure expressly to permit is not to prohibit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Before one may be punished, it must appear that his case is plainly within the statute; there are no constructive offenses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.