Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 U.S. 24 - In re 620 Church Street Building Corp.

In re 620 Church Street Building Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

299 U.S. 24 · 1936

Citation profile

192
cited by 192 later decisions
27
cited 27 times by the Supreme Court
March 2017
most recently cited

93 federal appellate · 12 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 192 later decisions (27 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. (1939), Holiday v. Johnston (1941)

93 federal appellate · 12 district ·

760193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Ex Parte Chetwood · Plymouth Coal Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania T · Southern Railway Company v. Josephine King No 140 Southern Railway Company · Tennessee Pub Co v. American Nat Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 192 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Petitioners insist that their consent to the plan of reorganization was necessary or that their claims should have been accorded `adequate protection.' But the adequate protection to which the statute refers is `for the realization of the value of the interests, claims or liens' affected. Here the controlling finding is not only that there was no equity in the property above the first mortgage, but that petitioners' claims were appraised by the court as having `no value.' There was no value to be protected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.