Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

299 U.S. 521

Docket No. 374.

Lauro v. Barker

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued January 14, 1937.

Decided January 18, 1937.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1937-01-18

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1941

2 counsel of record

Relies on Goodrich v. Ferris · Bellingham Bay Co v. City of New Whatcom · Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1937-01-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Per Curiam:

¶2The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. *522v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.

¶3Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants.

¶4Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.

/299/us/521 · .json · Public domain