Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 Abb. Pr. 248

Ebner v. Bradford

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1867

New York Supreme Court · decided 1867-03-15

<p>Attachment.—When it may Issue.</p> <p>The attachment authorized by section 227 of the Code of Procedure, is allowable in actions for legal relief only. It cannot be issued in an action for equitable relief;—e. g., an action seeking to have a deed canceled, and an accounting and an injunction and receiver.</p>

Decided 1867-03-15

E. Darwin Smith, J.

¶1The complaint in this action states a cause of action purely of an equitable nature; and prays for equitable relief, - and a judgment setting aside deeds, and for an accounting, and for an injunction and receiver. The *249attachment, given by the Code in section 227, is allowable “ in actions for the recovery of money onlyand by the amendment of 1866, “in actions for the wrongful conversion of personal property.” This amendment extends the attachment to legal actions, or actions of a legal nature, for the recovery of damages for the value of personal property tortiously taken or converted. It applies, also, to such actions as would have been denominated, before the Code, trover, trespass or replevin. It presupposes a judgment at law for damages, which may be followed by an execution to levy upon particular property. Upon the complainant’s complaint, he will not be entitled to any such single judgment.

¶2I do not think the legislature intended to extend the remedy by attachment, to equitable actions.

¶3I know of no case- where it has been so held, and think the plaintiff is not entitled to this remedy, in this case, upon the facts stated in his complaint. ‘

¶4The attachment must, therefore, be set aside, with ten dollars costs.

/3/abbpr/248 · .json · Public domain