Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 AD2D 595 - Augstein v. Levey

Augstein v. Levey’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1995

2 state decisions

8019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sielcken-Schwarz v. American Factors, Ltd. · Coane v. American Distilling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All that is necessary to commence the running of the statute is “knowledge of facts sufficient "to suggest to a person of ordinary intelligence the probability that he has been defrauded.’ ” Id. at 751.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not view with favor a claim of estoppel grounded in fraud.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “under a duty to make inquiry and ascertain for themselves all the relevant facts,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.