Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

3 A.D.2d 744

Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1957-03-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1991

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1957-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted. Plaintiff has failed to establish special circumstances which would warrant a departure from the general rule denying examinations before trial in matrimonial actions. The mere fact that one of the causes of action alleged in the complaint is based on nonsupport is insufficient to establish special circumstances under subdivision 6 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules (Liebmann v. IAebmann, 3 A D 2d 660). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

/3/ad2d/744 · .json · Public domain