¶1Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Defendant is not prejudiced by the discontinuance, as he is free to raise any question he may wish with respect to or based upon the alleged separation agreement. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Prank, Yalente and McNally, JJ.
3 A.D.2d 821
Taylor v. Taylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1957
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1957-04-09
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2010
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1957-04-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →