3 Ariz. 383
Decided January 30, 1892
Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1892-01-30
<p>1. Appeal and Error—What Appealable—Final Judgments—Order Dissolving Temporary Injunction—History Co. v. Dougherty, post, p. 387, 29 Pac. 649, Cited and Approved.—This court has jurisdiction on appeals from final judgments, citing History Co. v. Dougherty, supra. This court has no jurisdiction of an appeal from an order dissolving a temporary injunction; it not being a final judgment.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Dismissed · Decided 1892-01-30
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2002
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This is an appeal from an order of the court below, dissolving 'a temporary restraining order. In the case of History Co. v. Dougherty, post, p. 387, 29 Pac. 649, (decided at this term,) we held that this court has appellate jurisdiction in appeals from final judgments. The order here appealed from is not a final judgment; hence this court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.
¶2Sloan, J., not sitting.