Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 ARIZAPP 206 - Foster v. Ames

Foster v. Ames’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2015

8 state decisions

40196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 1 Ariz. App. 603 - Hurst v. Hurst · McRae v. Dodt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In accordance with the difference of opinion as to the necessity of notice of applications to a court by its. receiver for instructions or directions, * * * there is authority, on the one hand, for the view that the confirmation of a receiver’s sale should be on notice to the parties who have appeared in the receivership suit, and, on the other hand, that no notice thereof is necessary, since the parties to the’suit must take notice of motions made therein.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.