Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ariz. App. 226 - State v. Claytor

3 Ariz. App. 226 - State v. Claytor’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 1 Ariz. App. 181 - State v. Anders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As the record stands, defendant is charged with drawing a check on no account. He pled guilty to drawing a check on insufficient funds account. Although the crimes of drawing a check on insufficient funds and drawing a check on no account are contained in the same statutory section they still remain separate crimes, neither being an included offense of the other. Since the instant information does not allege the essential fact that there is an account with insufficient funds, defendant has pled to a crime which has not been legally alleged. The plea cannot stand.” 3 Ariz.App. at 229 , 413 P.2d at 288 . (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.