Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 ARIZAPP 316 - Chenowth v. Epperson

Chenowth v. Epperson’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1969
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. MacMurtrie · Mortensen v. Knight · Perez v. Tomberlin · Wakeham v. Omega Construction Company · Martinez v. Coombs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If he does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.