3 Ariz. App. 377 - State v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 1972
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Ariz. App. 71 - State v. Cobb · Montgomery v. Eyman · 3 Ariz. App. 114 - State v. Salazar · Pruitt v. State · 1 Ariz. App. 354 - State v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The court may take the fact of prior convictions into consideration in determining the sentence even though the prior conviction is not charged in the information or established as required by law, provided the sentence imposed does not exceed the maximum authorized by statute for the charged offense. State v. Adams, 1 Ariz.App. 354 , 403 P.2d 7 (1965). However, in order for the trial court to consider a previous conviction and impose a sentence in excess of the maximum permitted for the charged crime under the statute requiring increased punishment for subsequent offenses, the requisites of Rule 180, of the Rules of Criminal Procedure must be followed. Montgomery v. Eyman, 96 Ariz. 55 , 391 P.2d 915 (1964).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No matter how clear and convincing the evidence may be as to the guilt of a defendant, no matter what admissions may be made by him or by his counsel during the process of trial, the trial judge cannot take from the jury the right of freely passing upon the guilt or innocence of the defendant so long as the plea of not guilty stands.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armstrong““The determining question then is whether an admission of a prior conviction may be entered by counsel for accused or must be made by accused himself. It is our opinion that Criminal Rule 180 requires that the defendant personally admit the truth of the allegation or at least confirm an admission made by his attorney.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tomes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.