3 Ariz. App. 63 - Jackling v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Northen v. Elledge · State Board of Technical Registration v. McDaniel · State Board of Technical Registration v. Bauer · State v. Beadle · State Board of Examiners for Architects & Engineers v. Rodgers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“*‘We believe that since Snyder performed his portion of the contract up to the rough grading portion at the time the contract was broken or terminated by Jackling, the testimony is ample from which the jury might find that the plaintiff Snyder was entitled to be remunerated on the basis of 75% of the agreed contract less offsets and credits to Jack-ling. Woodward v. White, La.App., 125 So.2d 509 (1961).” Jackling v. Snyder, 3 Ariz.App. 63 , 411 P.2d 822, 826 (1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.