Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 3 Ark. App. 48 - Rainbolt v. Everett

3 Ark. App. 48 - Rainbolt v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2003

20 state decisions

120198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foote's Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenry · 337 F. Supp. 1093 - Gestuvo v. District Director of United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine of estoppel is applicable when four essential elements are present: (1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted on or must so act that the party asserting the estoppel had a right to believe it is so intended; (3) the latter must be ignorant of the true facts; and (4) he must rely on the former’s conduct to his injury. Rainbolt v. Everett, 3 Ark. App. 48 , 621 S.W.2d 877 (1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Agency, Appeal Tribunal, and Board of Review specifically found that appellant did quit to accompany her spouse to a new place of residence, so that issue is not before us. The sole question involved is whether she immediately entered the labor market....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.