¶1This demurrer must be sustained, I think, upon the principle that equity has no jurisdiction to enforce such a decree for alimony rendered by a court of another State, the remedy at law being adequate.
¶2Davis vs. Davis, 299 App. D. C., 258; 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1169.
¶3The remaining questions I leave to be decided as they may be presented hereafter.
¶4See 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1069 note.
¶520 Annot. Cas. 1069 note.
¶62 Annot. Cas. 820 note.
¶73 Annot. Cas. 579 note.