Sinnott v. . Feiock’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
2 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Roach v. . Curtis (1908), State v. Willits (2002)
2 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yesler v. City of Seattle · Nichols v. . Michael · Devoe v. . Brandt · Barnett v. . Selling · Hall v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“can be maintained under all circumstances to the same extent as an action for conversion. Such a doctrine would substantially destroy the characteristics of an action of replevin which distinguish it as an action to recover possession of specific property, * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wood v. Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.